Sunday, June 3, 2012

What's Happening with Dr. Who?

For most of my lifetime I've been a Dr. Who fan.  And by lifetime, I mean most of the 40 years that I've been alive.  I remember the 3rd Doctor.  I remember the 1st Master.  And for my money, Tom Baker will always be the "true" doctor.

Being an American, it's been hard to consistantly watch the good Doctor.  Something happend around the Colin Baker era that made Dr Who episodes scarce stateside.  Things got even worse during Sylvestor McCoy, until the show was finally canceled.  We here across the ocean didn't even get to see the few charity/tribute episodes after that (though we did get a bad FOX version).

Then it was announced that Dr. Who was going to be rebooted.  I watched the Christopher Eccleston Doctor and was impressed, though I did think Billie Piper's Rose stole the show.  Then Eccleston decided to go back to being the villian in bad American movies, and we got David Tennant's Doctor.  Though I did like Tennant's version (it's the closest to Tom Baker's, though Tennant has admitted to having a preference for the much-hated Peter Davidson) the show became decidely more campy.  The show runners start talking about how much they liked watching Dr. Who as kids (which I also did).  Then they started talking about how they wanted Dr. Who to be a kid's show.  The show got more and more "kids-like" and with no kids of my own, I just couldn't bare it any longer.  I turned it off.    For the first time in my life I willingly did not watch the show.  And I didn't watch it for a long time.

For a list of the shows I did watch in the meantime, check the various HBO, Showtime, AMC, and FX shows that are listed throughout this blog.

After many years of going without the Doctor, I started watching a show called Sherlock produced by the BBC and shown in the states on PBS.  That show was definately not "just for kids."  It also turns out that at some time the showrunner for Sherlock (Steven Moffat) became the showrunner for Dr. Who.  Season 6 of Dr. Who was available on iTunes, so I decided to watch. 

I found myself impressed by what I saw.  The first episode, "The Impossible Astronaught" was well written with a decidedly dark atmosphere and a few scenes of real tension.  It also starred Supernatural's own "King of Hell", Mark Sheppard.  The new doctor, Matt Smith, seems a nice blend of geek chic (though my wife complains about his bad British skin).  His new companion, played by Karen Gilan is sexy, talented, red haired, and Scottish (she does NOT have bad skin).

I was impressed enough to watch more episodes and I liked them.  "The Doctors Wife" written by Neil Gaiman stands out for its unique take on the question "Did the Doctor steal the Tardis?"

So what IS the doctor trying to do?  Is he becomming more of an adult, or maybe just growing into the college-age cousin that both kids and adults can tolerate?  I don't see the show ever getting in line with The Walking Dead or Breaking Bad, but Sherlock seems to be with in its reach (especially given its pedigree).  I'll keep watching, though it's still not quite the quality that adults in the states are used to seeing on Sunday nights. 

Friday, July 23, 2010

Review of Alan Wake

I assume that since the first words out of the narrator's mouth were "Stephen King" that Microsoft Studios intentionally wanted you to feel like that you're in a Stephen King novel. Well, they've done a very good job of it. Unfortunately, at it's heart, Alan Wake is just another shooter, on a platform dominated by shooters, from a publisher known for repackaging other people's ideas and trying to pawn them off as genius.

That's not to say that Alan Wake doesn't have a lot going for it. The graphics are beautiful and lifelike. You really do feel like you're in the middle of the pacific northwest. When you walk across a dilapidated bridge, you look down and see the waves below you moving and reflecting light in a realistic way. Character models are also very detailed (though Alan's wife looks like she has a little too much Botox).

What sets Alan Wake apart is the writing. Mikko Rautalahti wrote the story and he goes out of his way to prove that his grasp or character, story, and pacing far excels any of his brethren (that includes Mass Effect and Dragon Age Origins). The characters are straight out of a Stephen King novel and at least three of the Master of Horror's works will pop into your mind within 20 minutes of this game. It helps that the voice acting is well done and that the actors seem to care about this material (as opposed to the sleepwalking-cash my check attitude prone to video games). Alan is a flushed-out real person. He has a sharp, wounding sense of humor compounded by the fact that not only is he a writer, but he's a writer from New York. At the same time, he seems to realize that he's been a real asshole to his wife and that his problems stem from himself, not other people (that however, does not keep him from doing things that he REALLY regrets later on). This all gives him a unique motivation once things get nasty, he's not just a loving husband, but one who realizes he's done a lot of things he should have appologized for a long time ago.

I honestly feel self-conscious about summarizing the plot because I don't think I can convey just how good (in video-game terms) this story is, but here goes. You star as Alan Wake, a writer who has suffered from two years of writer's block after writing a best-selling novel. So that means you've been a jerk to your wife. To save your marriage (not your writer's block as many other reviewers have reported -- I payed real money for this game so I've actually played it) you and your wife decide to travel to the rural town of Bright Falls somewhere in the Pacific Northwest. However, all is not as it seems and pretty soon your wife is missing and you wake up a week later with short term amnesia. The story then revolves around you trying to save said wife and piecing together a story you don't remember writing that may help you solve the mystery of what happened in the previous week.



The pacing of the story is frenetic, with the first ten minutes making me the most excited I've been since the original Fatal Frame (not any of the sucky sequels). Yes, it's a dream sequence but it's probably the best dream sequence in video games, books, TV, and movies in the past 20 years. There are enough bumps and thrills that I pressed my three dogs into service to lie next to me on the couch while I played (they didn't seem to mind).

As you continue on to the town of Bright Falls, you meet enough interesting people and disturbing situations to spark your interest. Throughout the entire experience, the game does a good job of leading you by the nose. I don't think I've been wondering "what happens next" so often since I was forced to watch one episode a week of True Blood in order to catch up on season 2 (apparently Bacchus is not the happy-go-lucky, smoke'em-if-you-got'em god I always thought he was).

The semi-truck hitting the brick wall moment comes when you're actually forced to play the game. You know how many games have a button that you can press in order to skip the story and go to the game play? I wish Alan Wake had the opposite: a button to press in order to skip the game play and go to the story.

Despite the labeling on the package of "psychological thriller" the point of this game is to shoot bunches of enemies. In this case instead of aliens, zombies, or demons the baddies are possessed loggers. This is a two gun shooter, the flashlight in your left hand burns away the darkness that is protecting them while you use the weapon in your right hand to finish them off. The mechanic is neat at first, but I eventually got tired of it. And though the enemy models are very lifelike, I quickly realized there were only three types of enemies that I fought (hand to hand, ranged, and "muscle"). And that I continually fought them over and over and over again.

However, there are some bright spots that made me think things would change. Episode One ended with a haunting song by Roy Orbison that had me running to iTunes to purchase. Episode Two then began with a "Last time on Alan Wake" refresher that seemed right out of any of my favorite cable television shows (currently Dexter but any one will do). So I hoped the game play would pick up. It didn't. Bear traps were added. Irritating, repetitive, unfun bear traps.

I found that I had more fun when there were no enemies around. I enjoyed looking for the book pages, exploring the abandoned plane, or watching the latest episode of the Twilight Zone spin off.

What would I do to improve this game if there's a sequel? I think I would prefer more of a Grand Theft Auto or Dragon Age Origins free-flowing environment. The landscape and the characters are certainly there. Also I would like to see more puzzle solving. As it is now, I think I would prefer to have seen all the game play removed and have this be more of an interactive book along the lines of Disgaea Infinite. I honestly think I would have had more fun. Instead, I got Resident Evil with Plot.

I don't think I'll finish Alan Wake, despite how much I REALLY want to see the ending (though I've heard it's not nearly as good as the earlier episodes). That makes giving it a score hard. Is this what console gaming has devolved to? Endless and endless shooter titles while I'm guilt-tripped by game executives with profit margin reports making me feel like I have to like these? But at the same time there is so much I like about Alan Wake (and there seem to be a whole load of game reviewers on the bandwagon). But in the end, this is a game, and it's the game components that let me down. I'll give it the rental score of 6.5/10 because I can't rate on what could have been (or wish had been). I suggest if you rent this before buying, play a few hours. If you only play the first 20 minutes, then you'll go running to the store to purchase it only to be disappointed later on.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Sherlock Holmes

Once it became available on pay per view, I finally got around to watching Sherlock Holmes. I must admit that I'm conflicted about this film. The cast, in some respects, is outstanding, particularly Robert Downey Jr. He's emerged from the wasteland of continual rehab to become one of Hollywood's most talented and likable stars. His portrayal of Holmes is spot on, though sometimes I had to really crank up the sound to hear what he was mumbling.
I have to admit that I've always liked Rachel McAdams, and if she had been cast as Maid #3 I would have still wanted to rent this movie just to see her. She gives an energetic and nuanced performance as Holmes' somewhat-love interest Irene Adler. That, combined with her own blend of special effects involving partial nudity back shots and silk robes, was worth the price of the movie alone.
Jude Law gives an enjoyable performance as Dr. Watson. And I've always thought he got more press for whom he dated as opposed to the quality of his work.
Where this movie falls down hard is the villain and his "dastardly" plan. Mark Strong was the only halfway decent thing about RocknRolla (a movie, by the way, I had to start and stop three times before I could finish). However, his Lord Blackwood doesn't come across as particularly intelligent. And once I learned his true identity, I was doubly disappointed. I just get the feeling that Lord Blackwood spends most of his time in the pub having beers with his mates, not cooking up malevolent plans to rule England. I can't help thinking about what a younger Sir Anthony Hopkins could have done with this role. Now there would've been a bad guy for the ages.
As it turns out, despite every character telling me the contrary, Lord Blackwood isn't really that smart. Once I learned of his plan, I knew it wouldn't work. And it really just boils down to the fact that he's buddies with a seven foot tall French guy. And we all know what trouble you get into when the only thing you have going for you is the French.
Blackwood is also a horrible engineer. Apparently, he's never attended a lecture on single point of failure or risk management.
And that's what bothers me most about this movie. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle started a whole new branch of science and law enforcement with his works, but the movie is just a collection of triviality posing as genius. Can't anyone write a plot anymore? Feel free to post comments with the name of any writer born after 1940 that can actually write an original plot.
See Sherlock Holmes for the "good guys" but you'll have to cut the villain a little slack.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Rock Chicks

I would like to take a few paragraphs to comment on the latest crop of Rock Divas.

Christina Aguilera definitely has the most talent.  She can actually sing.  Her voice is strong enough that she doesn't need an amplifier.  She can wail old school.  Plus, she's the only one who tries to be an artist, each of her albums has a distinct feel and sound.

Pink (I'll forgo the exclamation point) consistently over-performs.  She should be cheap, throwaway pop.  But all of her albums deliver above my expectations.  True, a divorce may have fueled her latest creation, but I can keep going back to her songs time and time again.

Avril Lavigne is the anti-Pink.  She should be much better than she is.  She probably made millions by tieing-in her clothing line with the bubble-gum-pop album she released.  But come on, she has more talent than that.  Though she does look good in a plaid mini-skirt.

Beyonce is a gorgeous model.  She's a good actress.  She can't sing.  She's known as a singer.  Sometimes entertainment baffles me.

Things to Do While Your Money Evaporates

We gave the big firms on Wall Street all of our money and like the Good Samaritans they are, they took it.  So while you're watching your retirement go down the tube (while Social Security is being raided) here's a list of things you can do.

6.  Visit your favorite porn star's MySpace page.  That's all MySpace is good for.  Alexis Silver has a pretty good one.

5.   Play King's Bounty.  I think this game has been played by all of three people.  But it's pretty good.  Much better than the over-hyped Spore, and a break from brain death by shooter.  This solo game makes me remember why I like video games.  

4.  Switch to Google Chrome.  Yeah, its the browser that no one uses.  But I like it.  It's a nice step forward in browser technology.  Most of the innovations are under the hood (but super cool) so the front end user won't notice them.  However, take a tour through the product introduction (written as a comic book) and you'll enjoy the improvements over Internet Explorer.

3.  Watch The Shield.  Yeah I know.  All the critics say to watch this show so no one does.  But it's good.  I promise.  Michael Chiklis  is a good actor when he's not in a cheesy Thing rubber suit.  This show will push your moral boundaries.

2.  By an iPhone (assuming you have $300 after Wall Street is done with you).  I haven't stopped playing with mine since I got it.  Plus, it's pretty easy to hide at work.  

1.  Watch The Wire.  Another show that critics like so no one watches.  And it's been cancelled.  Episodes can be downloaded to iTunes pretty cheaply, though. One of it's themes is overwhelming bureaucracy, something that anyone who works for a computer software company should be able to relate to.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Pabst Blue Ribbon

When I was growing up, "Pabst Blue Ribbon" was the beer that people from the trailer park drank. When did it become popular with young people? Now when I go to a bar, I see perfectly respectable young people who seem to have no criminal records drinking it. Next thing you know, they'll be serving Old English at Mortenson's.

Crappy Seventies Restaurants

I just got back from visiting a place in Denver called the Funky Buddha. Its supposed to be a really happening joint, and they're were a lot of young people there. I guess that says something about me if I comment on the amount of young people.

But I don't get the fascination with 70's restaurants like this one -- bad decor, bad food, bad beer, and uncomfortable seats. I mean, there's a reason that the seventies are part of the past: everything was bad.

Of course things might have been better if the food and drinks were at seventies prices, but sorry, the tab was all 2008.